« A Tale of Two Books on Knowledge | Main | The KM Benefits of Having a Higher Purpose »

March 27, 2006

Building Your Company's Innovation Portfolio

Innovation is back in style. Many companies that had been cautious over the past several years and primarily focused on cost reductions are now turning their focus to innovation. There is ample evidence of this orientation. For example, 87% of senior executives in a 2005 survey said that generating organic growth through innovation is necessary for success in their industries, and 74% planned to increase spending on innovation in 2005.1

Yet the mere desire for more innovation won't make it happen, and many organizations have poorly-managed approaches to innovation. In particular, they have too narrow a focus on innovation, and address only the product innovation domain. They do not manage an innovation portfolio in terms of how they source, fund, monitor, and assign responsibility for innovation. As a result, they will continue to have weak innovation results. In the 2005 study mentioned above, only 49% of the surveyed executives were satisfied with the financial returns on investments in innovation. In another 2005 analysis, there was no correlation between spending on innovation and the overall financial performance of organizations.2

In order to construct and manage an innovation portfolio, an organization must identify the types of innovation that are important to it, the key steps in the innovation process, and the primary responsibilities for managing it. Then it can begin to create a more formal approach for managing a broader, more comprehensive innovation portfolio. I'll describe each of the elements of such a portfolio.

Types of Innovation
What are the possible types of innovation that organizations can and should pursue? Unfortunately, most organizations focus only upon product innovation. In a 2003 study of companies' innovation sourcing strategies, two other researchers and I discovered that product innovation was far more likely to be addressed than any other type. 70% of the executives surveyed in the study said their organizations pursued product innovation, whereas the next most common responses (service and process innovation) were being pursued by only 20% of respondents.

Product innovation is certainly important, and in some ways it offers the clearest economic payoff for innovation. Companies create products, take them to market, and sell them to customers. Yet there are important arguments for going beyond product innovation alone. First of all, an increasing proportion of sophisticated economies are based on services—over 70% in the United States, for example3. Secondly, even in product markets, customers often buy products not just on the basis of the product's characteristics, but on the business model and processes by which the product is sold, and the services offered after the sale. Finally, companies are much more likely to produce effective and economically valuable products and services if they have innovative and high-quality management approaches.

IBM illustrates both the predominance of product innovation, and the emerging rise of other innovation domains. For several decades the company has vigorously pursued product and component research at its corporate laboratories such as Watson and Almaden. Despite the fact that half of its revenues derive from services, only in the last year has the company officially recognized services innovation as part of its innovation portfolio, creating the Services Research group at its Almaden Labs.

What does service innovation mean? For companies such as IBM offering business services, it means the development and testing of new ways to deliver services such as e-commerce, and new ways to help organizations change their cultures and processes. For organizations such as Bank of America that serve consumers, service innovation can mean identifying and testing new approaches to serve customers at the branch or point of sale.4 For a company that performs detailed building services such as ServiceMaster, service innovation might take the form of industrial engineering-like attempts to streamline movements and reduce wear and tear on workers and equipment. Of course, just as product innovation takes a somewhat different form in each company, so will service innovation.

Organizations are increasingly prospering from a combination of product and service innovation. Apple's iPod, for example, would not have been nearly as successful without the availability of the iTunes content downloading service. When IT companies such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard announce new products, there is often a need for services to install, implement, maintain, or extract value from them.

Process innovation can take place in product or service firms. It usually involves either internal business processes, or those involved in delivering products and services to customers. Process innovation can involve revolutionary or breakthough improvement in broad, cross-functional processes (sometimes called business process reengineering),5 or can also entail continuous or one-time improvement in smaller processes, as in Total Quality Management or Six Sigma initiatives. Some companies focus their process innovation efforts in some areas more than others. Dell Computer, for example, is more oriented to manufacturing and supply chain processes than to any other type. Others, such as Raytheon, have a broad corporate program that addresses all processes with one approach (Six Sigma in Raytheon’s case). Most organizations should have a portfolio of process innovation initiatives underway at any given time, including both breakthrough and incremental innovations where necessary.

Managerial innovation involves the exploration and adoption of new approaches for managing people, technology, and other strategic business resources. There have been hundreds of new management ideas over the past several decades, yet most organizations are woefully haphazard or faddish in how they adopt and embrace particular ideas. Just as product innovation usually involves researchers and engineers, and process improvement has specialists such as Six Sigma "black belts," managerial innovation is usually driven by a type of individual called an "idea practitioner"—someone who identifies appropriate new management ideas and shepherds them through implementation.6

Business model innovation may be the least well known of all the innovation domains. Business models are an organization's fundamental logic for going to market and making money. Business model innovation is critical because it is directly tied to an organization's economic fortunes. The concept became popular at the height of the e-commerce explosion, when many companies explored online business models for the first time. But e-commerce isn't the only form of business model innovation that companies can explore. Any company offering an expensive product for sale, for example, could explore the possibility of selling the same capability as an on-demand service (as many computer firms, including IBM and Hewlett-Packard) are currently doing.

Clearly there are other potential innovation types in addition to these, such as store design, architectural, and packaging innovation. Not all of these will be appropriate for all organizations at all times. Clearly some forms of innovation are going to be more important to a particular firm than others. However, a broad portfolio of innovation domains is desirable.

Additional Information:
1 Boston Consulting Group, "Innovation 2005," online at www.bcg.com
2 Barry Jaruzelski et al, "Money Isn't Everything," Strategy + Business 41, Winter 2005, p. 57.
3 James Brian Quinn, Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service-Based Paradigm for Industry. (Free Press, 1992)
4 Stefan Thomke, "R&D Comes to Services: Bank of America's Pathbreaking Experiments," Harvard Business Review, April 2003.
5 Thomas H. Davenport, Process Innovation: Rengineering Work though Information Technology (Harvard Business School Press, 1993).
6 Thomas H. Davenport and Lawrence Prusak, What's the Big Idea? Creating and Capitalizing on the Best Management Thinking (Harvard Business School Press, 2003).

Posted by Tom Davenport on March 27, 2006 11:38 AM | Permalink

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.babsonknowledge.org/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/29

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Building Your Company's Innovation Portfolio:

» Tom Davenport on the new innovation from Column 2
According to Davenport, innovation is back in style. As he points out, however, 70% of that focus is on product innovation, and that organizations need to be thinking about a "broad portfolio of innovation domains", including process, services, manager... [Read More]

Tracked on April 3, 2006 03:19 PM

» Knowledge Collaboration versus Knowledge Management from Design Collaboration

Speed to market is a key element in creating competitive advantage. Innovation is the supreme mantra of aggressive organizations. Bringing new products or services to market involves more than R&am...

[Read More]

Tracked on April 15, 2006 11:44 PM

» Larry Keeley's 10 Types of Innovation from ChristianSarkar.com
I met Larry Keeley through a mutual friend several years ago.  He's the thought leader behind Doblin, the innovation consulting company that's now part of Deloitte.  At the time, Larry had come up with an innovation scanning methodology which... [Read More]

Tracked on December 2, 2013 12:56 PM

Comments

Very interesting post. Indeed, it seems like the different types of innovation are underexploited - particularly business model innovation. Today's business environment offers so many business design opportunities while CEOs seem to focus mainly on product and maybe service innovation...

I wrote a blogpost about "design spaces for innovation":
http://business-model-design.blogspot.com/2005/11/design-spaces-for-business-model.html

and a blogpost about the "types of disruptive innovation":
http://business-model-design.blogspot.com/2005/11/designing-disruptive-innovations.html

Warm regards from Chiang Mai, Thailand,
Alexander

Posted by: Alex Osterwalder | April 2, 2006 11:49 AM

Xin chao, Minh den tu HL, minh mong muon duoc lam quen voi tat ca cac ban. Thanks you

Posted by: phuong | March 31, 2006 04:46 AM

What you have defined as a central issue for innovation is collaboration and coordination of the strategic resources. I suggest Chief Collaboration Officer as the title for the coordinator of all innovation. As the world becomes flatter and innovation stakeholders are more broadly distributed geographically, the ability to collaborate efficiently is as important as the innovation. A Google search for the term "collaboration" returns 742,000,000 results. That's one measure of its importance.
The importance of innovation is a given. Who controls it, and how organizations enable contributors to participate is the next challenge. See: http://blog.qmind.com/blog/2006/3/21/collaboration-strategy-for-a-flat-world.html as an example of collaborative technology to help the CCO manage the task.

Posted by: Chas Martin | March 29, 2006 12:10 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)